Published on August 11th, 2015 | by Rayne0
Irony, thy name is Big Organic
I love when science deniers prove me right.
And today is no different.
For those of you who don’t know what’s happening, anti-gmoers have decided they would use legislation to harass scientists rather than provide supporting evidence for their assertions against GMOs. In what is fast becoming a grand display of hypocritical irony, anti-gmoers have once again proven their position is not one based in science, but one based in fear, conspiracy theories and opinion.
The organisation “US Right to Know of Oakland, California“, is using Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to suppress and harass scientists they feel have “ties” to the agricultural biotechnology industry in an attempt to prove that scientists are being paid off.
Because you know, it’s easier to try to confirm your preconceived opinions than to provide scientific evidence for them. I guess one could say they are attempting to provide supporting evidence – for their conspiracy theories. And we all know science denial is based on fear and conspiracy theories.
One such scientist, Kevin Folta, a long-term science communicator has been at the forefront of the attack. Anti-gmo conspiracy theorists feel they have uncovered a goldmine of information, when they used FOIA to discover the not-so-secret fact that Monsanto donated $25,000 for science outreach. The initial story from US Right to Know was that Folta was a paid shill for Monsanto therefore discrediting Folta’s work.
Even though Monsanto donated the money, it is used purely to educate scientists and teachers about how to become better science communicators, Folta doesn’t get to keep it. He uses it to organise seminars designed to educate scientists and teachers on how to become better science educators and teachers. Scandalous! Yes, shocked readers, a biotech company gave a science educator money to educate science educators about how to educate people in science – particularly in the field of biotechnology. Next you’ll be shocked that Ford gives money to educators to educate about cars.
Quite right, the only thing that can unscience science, is going to be better science and since anti-gmo science deniers hate science – I don’t think we need to be concerned with anti-gmoers undoing biotechnology using science any time soon. We do however, need to be concerned with science deniers abusing legislation for their own gain. When you don’t have science to back you up, create a smear campaign against your target.
Much to Folta’s credit, the man does love transparency. He’s taken on this attack with open arms and said “come at me, bitches” (well, maybe not those exact words) because transparency is the key. Where he gets his money from and for what is already in the public domain. He has nothing to hide.
If US Right to Know want to play the Shill Gambit card. Let’s play the Shill Gambit card. Let’s use their own conspiracy against them.
Oh, dear. $114,500 dollars from the Organic Consumers Association. A shill for OCA (a group dedicated to demonising biotechnology, they’re also anti-medicine. Check out their Facebook page) attempting to silence pro-gmo scientists. The irony, it burns. Did I mention that Gary Ruskin is the former campaign manager for the Yes on Prop 37 (mandatory GMO labeling ballot measure in California)?
Did I also mention that OCA doesn’t show their donors (how very transparent of them), but examining public records has found major funding from Eden Organic, Whole Foods, Nutiva, and Dr. Bronner’s. All of which are major organic businesses with a financial interest in demonising biotechnology. For his role in spreading the message of Evil GMO’s, Ronald Cummins the CEO of OCA got paid $99,590 in 2013.
$40,00 for speaking engagements against GMO’s from those who have a vested interest in eliminating GMO’s in favour of organic? Say it isn’t so! She’s not even a damn biotech scientist, her degree is in Physics with a Master’s in Philosophy.
Here’s a tip, if you’re going to lead a smear campaign to promote your conspiracy theories – you should probably make sure you aren’t doing the same thing you’re demonising scientists for. If you want to cry ” Shill” at a scientist who took a donation from a biotech company to educate about biotech – don’t take money from organic businesses (whose aim it is to end GMO’s and biotechnological research), to fund your campaign to end GMO’s.